Skip to main content

And After College? The Female Vanishing Act

Last week the Ministry for Women presented its latest report on the situation of women in Austria. The good news is education: Women constitute slightly more than half of all people with college degrees. Gender equality at last! Let's get out the champagne, sisters!

Should we? Here are some other facts:
  • Only 7.8 percent of women with college degrees hold leading positions in the workforce, but every fourth man with a college degree works in a leading position.
  • Women are less likely to make it into the echelons of publicly traded companies. In the year of 2008 (the last year for which data are available) there was not a single woman leading a large company in Austria. Representation among board members was six percent.
  • Women are less likely to hold high positions in universities. Only 15.8 percent of professors are female.
I find these numbers sobering enough, but what really gets me is that for the same work, women in Austria earn less money than men. In addition, the gender pay gap in Austria is wider than in almost all other states of the EU. The average gross hourly earnings of women in Austria lie 25.5 percent lower than those of men (only Estonian and Slovenian women fare worse than Austrian women.)

This mess got me thinking about politics. Different from the United States Austria has a Ministry for Women (currently held by Gabriele Heinisch-Hosek, Social Democrats, left). It has had such a ministry since the 1970s, albeit on a smaller scale originally. The ministry was successful in some areas, e.g. women hold 27 percent of the seats in parliament (definitely not bad compared to around 18 percent women in US Congress).

To shake things up a little Heinisch-Hosek is now advocating two measures: she wants affirmative action (quotas) for women in all large companies that are partially owned by the government; she wants to challenge companies to make earnings transparent. Both are top down approaches, and to some extent I find both worthy of support.

But fostering change from the bottom up is just as needed. This would start with reforms to the education system, a system which now favors memorizing and repetition of often meaningless data presented by a teacher over creative problem solving (also described in this post). Ironically, girls do better in this old fashioned system than boys - but it does not prepare them for the demands of their later work life (presentational skills, team work, independent thinking, assertiveness).

The bottom up approach would encourage women to think of themselves as leaders; to open up businesses; to find creative and cooperative, not necessarily government dependent solutions to the problems of balancing kids and career; to stay lifelong learners; to form she-networks that will (eventually) balance the influence of the old boys' clubs. Most importantly, it would support women in their diversity and try to stay away from the one-size-fits-all solutions the ministry often seems to prescribe now.
Picture: Manfred Werner/Wikimedia Commons; shows Gabriele Heinisch-Hosek


debi said…

Prejudices are such a sad thing.

In the US, the top-down efforts have definitely improved education opportunities, but I don't believe the bottom-up effort has been fully embraced here. Girls are not encouraged near enough in sciences and math in the US (nor in Austria from your data).

I was very fortunate in that my mom and dad totally supported my love of sciences. I received a BS in Mathematics and Physics. At the time I was the only woman in the department!

But my point is - without the support from home, it is very difficult to break out of the prejudicial mode of the country. Your point about bottom up change is, in my mind, the foundation of improvement.

Anonymous said…
I tend to think it also has to do with it being barely possible in Austria to have children (as a woman) and get into a high ranking job.
By the time a university career really takes off, most women are around thirty and they have to be very lucky if they have partners, who are willing to share parenthood equally, let alone take the lion’s share for a while.

So one of the main factors where politics could really interfere for the better, would be with making it financially a lot more profitable if both parents take an equal time off from their jobs.
Otherwise the number of women in high ranking academic jobs will always be hobbled by those of them who want children having them during the time an academic career needs the most attention (and unpaid overtime).
Debi and Nixennacht,

Thank you for taking the time to leave comments - and for your patience. I too believe that support from home is the best way to encourage girls to shoot for the top. But not all parents are up to the task, and ideally the support would come from schools too.

Regarding gender politics: Austria already has comparatively generous laws when it comes to paid parental leave from work. By contrast, women and men in the United States receive no government support if they stay home with a new child.

Austria's model is complicated and includes five different options. In one of these options new mothers/fathers who want to stay with their young child receive 80 percent of their last pay check for a maximum of 14 months - provided partners split the time with each partner taking at least two months off. If parents do not split their paid leave time they lose two months of benefits.

The splitting angle was introduced to Austria's parental leave law this year to entice more fathers to stay home with young children and to distribute the negative work related consequences of parental leave more evenly between the sexes. A gender equal ruling would force men to take seven of the 14 months, and I am all for it. Since men generally earn higher wages and salaries than women I am not sure everyone would be happy...

Popular posts from this blog

Ban on Plastic Bags Bugs L.A. County

Paper or plastic? Bag from South Africa. My friend recently came back from a trip to South Africa and brought me a reusable grocery bag. It is from Woolworths, one of the largest retail chains in South Africa; it is made by a community project and serves as a symbol of the company's commitment to sustainability and social development. I will think of this whenever I use my new bag. Thank you, dear friend! The Woolworths bag is not my first reusable bag. I carry two baggies which fold up into packs smaller than a deck of cards in my purse and a bunch of bigger ones in the trunk of my car. To me this feels like an easy way of making a difference environmentally. Others seem to have a harder time. When the county of Los Angeles recently introduced a ban on plastic bags for its unincorporated areas the new ordinance was met with resistance. Shops bemoan that paper is more expensive than plastic. They charge customers ten cents for every paper bag. Shoppers complain about the t

Passionate Nerd, Dull Date: Encounter With a Stamp Collector

"Their album - it's an excuse." Stamps from Austria Last week I received a packet from Austria. It came with two old fashioned looking petit point stamps. I do not collect stamps and would not recognize a Blue Mauritius if you sent me one but the stamps from Austria caught my interest. As my fingers were running over the stitching I couldn't help but wonder: does anyone still do petit point? Are young people here in L.A. or even back in Europe still acquiring the craft? I learned to stitch, sew, and knit in elementary school in Austria but handiwork was not my forte. On the contrary. Crafts used to be the one subject I loathed - though I believe that my mother still keeps the red and blue pot holder I crocheted in second grade. (It was supposed to be a square but ended up an irregular trapeze.) The other thing I was wondering about when the packet arrived is whether young people still collect stamps. When I was in high school I knew a guy my age with a collec

Casual Spirit, Egalitarian Touch: the American Potluck

"Meal at which all people present share dishes they brought"? Po tluck. Today being Labor Day some families in our neighborhood decided to get together for a potluck: grilled chicken and salmon, home made potato salad; a salad of spinach, blue cheese, and pears; a fruit platter, brownies... I like potlucks, their casual spirit, the egalitarian touch. Very American. Everybody pitches in, no one has to feel bad because one family or even one person had to do all the work. In Austria potlucks are not really common; there is not even a German word for the concept. It could be   Kesselglueck -  literal yet somewhat charming - but that term doesn't exist. On the web I found "Potluck: großes Abendessen, bei dem sich alle Anwesenden selbst mitgebrachte Speisen teilen" (translation from  Reverso ). This describes the idea accurately but it is a bit long. For those of you who don't speak German, here's a re-translation, phrased as an invitation: "P