Skip to main content

And After College? The Female Vanishing Act

Last week the Ministry for Women presented its latest report on the situation of women in Austria. The good news is education: Women constitute slightly more than half of all people with college degrees. Gender equality at last! Let's get out the champagne, sisters!

Should we? Here are some other facts:
  • Only 7.8 percent of women with college degrees hold leading positions in the workforce, but every fourth man with a college degree works in a leading position.
  • Women are less likely to make it into the echelons of publicly traded companies. In the year of 2008 (the last year for which data are available) there was not a single woman leading a large company in Austria. Representation among board members was six percent.
  • Women are less likely to hold high positions in universities. Only 15.8 percent of professors are female.
I find these numbers sobering enough, but what really gets me is that for the same work, women in Austria earn less money than men. In addition, the gender pay gap in Austria is wider than in almost all other states of the EU. The average gross hourly earnings of women in Austria lie 25.5 percent lower than those of men (only Estonian and Slovenian women fare worse than Austrian women.)

This mess got me thinking about politics. Different from the United States Austria has a Ministry for Women (currently held by Gabriele Heinisch-Hosek, Social Democrats, left). It has had such a ministry since the 1970s, albeit on a smaller scale originally. The ministry was successful in some areas, e.g. women hold 27 percent of the seats in parliament (definitely not bad compared to around 18 percent women in US Congress).

To shake things up a little Heinisch-Hosek is now advocating two measures: she wants affirmative action (quotas) for women in all large companies that are partially owned by the government; she wants to challenge companies to make earnings transparent. Both are top down approaches, and to some extent I find both worthy of support.

But fostering change from the bottom up is just as needed. This would start with reforms to the education system, a system which now favors memorizing and repetition of often meaningless data presented by a teacher over creative problem solving (also described in this post). Ironically, girls do better in this old fashioned system than boys - but it does not prepare them for the demands of their later work life (presentational skills, team work, independent thinking, assertiveness).

The bottom up approach would encourage women to think of themselves as leaders; to open up businesses; to find creative and cooperative, not necessarily government dependent solutions to the problems of balancing kids and career; to stay lifelong learners; to form she-networks that will (eventually) balance the influence of the old boys' clubs. Most importantly, it would support women in their diversity and try to stay away from the one-size-fits-all solutions the ministry often seems to prescribe now.
Picture: Manfred Werner/Wikimedia Commons; shows Gabriele Heinisch-Hosek

Comments

debi said…
Christina,

Prejudices are such a sad thing.

In the US, the top-down efforts have definitely improved education opportunities, but I don't believe the bottom-up effort has been fully embraced here. Girls are not encouraged near enough in sciences and math in the US (nor in Austria from your data).

I was very fortunate in that my mom and dad totally supported my love of sciences. I received a BS in Mathematics and Physics. At the time I was the only woman in the department!

But my point is - without the support from home, it is very difficult to break out of the prejudicial mode of the country. Your point about bottom up change is, in my mind, the foundation of improvement.

debi
Anonymous said…
I tend to think it also has to do with it being barely possible in Austria to have children (as a woman) and get into a high ranking job.
By the time a university career really takes off, most women are around thirty and they have to be very lucky if they have partners, who are willing to share parenthood equally, let alone take the lion’s share for a while.

So one of the main factors where politics could really interfere for the better, would be with making it financially a lot more profitable if both parents take an equal time off from their jobs.
Otherwise the number of women in high ranking academic jobs will always be hobbled by those of them who want children having them during the time an academic career needs the most attention (and unpaid overtime).
Debi and Nixennacht,

Thank you for taking the time to leave comments - and for your patience. I too believe that support from home is the best way to encourage girls to shoot for the top. But not all parents are up to the task, and ideally the support would come from schools too.

Regarding gender politics: Austria already has comparatively generous laws when it comes to paid parental leave from work. By contrast, women and men in the United States receive no government support if they stay home with a new child.

Austria's model is complicated and includes five different options. In one of these options new mothers/fathers who want to stay with their young child receive 80 percent of their last pay check for a maximum of 14 months - provided partners split the time with each partner taking at least two months off. If parents do not split their paid leave time they lose two months of benefits.

The splitting angle was introduced to Austria's parental leave law this year to entice more fathers to stay home with young children and to distribute the negative work related consequences of parental leave more evenly between the sexes. A gender equal ruling would force men to take seven of the 14 months, and I am all for it. Since men generally earn higher wages and salaries than women I am not sure everyone would be happy...

Popular posts from this blog

Visions of Editors: How Good Stories Go to Waste

Recently I stumbled upon Visions of Mary, a war story by Joseph Richardson. The book begins in a present day emergency room in Tennessee: A physician, a good guy who takes his work seriously, fights to establish the identity of a man who was found wandering about in a snow storm. The M.D.'s questions bring up memories of World War II in the disoriented patient. Thanks to the lost man's recollections we eventually learn that he is Colonel John Stone, an American war hero. The colonel tells the physician how he enlisted and became a pilot, how he married his sweetheart, Mary, and how he almost died when the Japanese shot down his plane, the "China Doll," in the last months of the war. After the attack, Stone and his men found themselves on a raft in the middle of a shark infested nowhere called the Pacific. Without food, water and radio connection their death seemed imminent. The men's fight for survival is where the book turns exciting: plunged into this crisis,

Lyman, Whitford, Reality Check: A Career in the West Wing?

On a chilly Sunday night in February two young girls in jeans and light blouses were standing in front of the artists' entrance of one of two local art theaters in Pasadena, California. The pathway beyond the barrier, an iron gate, was barely lit. It stayed empty for a long time while the girls, shifting weight from one foot to the other, chatted and giggled. After a while a figure emerged from the shadows. The girls fell silent but it was the wrong actor. When the right man, Bradley Whitford, finally appeared he was wearing a bicycle helmet pushed way up on his forehead. Whitford is best known for playing Josh Lyman in the TV series  The West Wing   but on that night he had performed in the Pasadena Playhouse's production of Yasmina Reza’s   Art.  The girls stopped the actor, told him about their social studies class and how the teacher would have them watch The West Wing.  Whitford smiled, asked, "Which school is it?" and autographed the two print-outs the girls

Solid Rock, Human Transience (The Huntington 2)

Organic blend: Chinese garden at the Huntington The Chinese garden at The Huntington Library, Art Collections and Botanical Gardens in San Marino (L.A. county) is a magical place. It blends the man-made and the natural, architecture with trees, straight lines and curves, all in an organic way. Last week, as I was wandering the cobbled paths of the garden I decided to take a closer look at some of the rocks. I got to my knees, admired the shades of white and grey, the undertones of purple, green, and red; I let my hand glide over the limestone's spurs, cracks, and sharp edges, felt the coolness of the rock against my skin, its enduring solidity against my human transience - and decided to look up some facts. Spurs and cracks: 50 Chinese stone workers flew in to carve the stone Transplants in L.A.: 850 tons of rock The limestone rocks in the Huntington's Chinese garden are transplants. They were imported from Lake Tai in the Yangtze Delta in China. Acc